Restitutio in Integrum in the Cancellation of Land Sale and Purchase Deeds Due to Wanprestasi (Breach of Contract): Legal Protection Analysis and Socio-Legal Implications for Third-Party Consumers

Authors

  • Mohammad Ahmad Eko Susilo Universitas Pelita Harapan
  • Helda Malta Universitas Pelita Harapan
  • Felicia Vanessa Japri Universitas Pelita Harapan
  • Windy Kosim Universitas Pelita Harapan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59784/glosains.v7i2.656

Keywords:

restitutio in integrum, breach of contract, land sale and purchase, seller protection

Abstract

Background: Wanprestasi (breach of contract) as a cause of land transaction disputes is a persistent and recurring problem in the governance of the agrarian legal system in Indonesia. The use of irrevocable powers of attorney to facilitate one-sided title transfers is a common manifestation of this issue.

Objective: The purpose of this paper is to analyze the mechanism of legal protection for the seller in the land transaction dispute involving fundamental wanprestasi and bad faith, with a case study of Supreme Court Decision No. 2134 K/Pdt/2024.

Methods: This article uses a normative juridical approach with a case study, focusing on Supreme Court Decision No. 2134 K/Pdt/2024 as the primary legal material, in addition to KUHPerdata Articles 1243–1248 (on compensation), 1320 (on the requirements for the validity of a contract), 1338 (on the general principles of good faith), and 1464 (on the retention of a down payment).

Results: The AJB (sale and purchase deed) and PPJB (binding sale and purchase agreement) should have been nullified (ex tunc/retroactive) since the buyer failed to pay the remaining balance of Rp2 billion—having only tendered Rp10.00 (ten rupiah)—and submitted falsified blank account documents. The court confirmed that the retention of the Rp2.32 billion seller's deposit was an essential protection measure to compensate for moral and material damages, as stipulated in Article 1464 of the Civil Code.

Conclusion: This jurisprudence enhances seller protection against predatory property development practices but highlights a significant gap in consumer protection within the existing land registration system. This study recommends legislative harmonization between the restitution provisions of the Civil Code and the Consumer Protection Law (UUPK).

References

Afifah, S. A. (2020). Analisis yuridis pembatalan akta perjanjian pengikatan jual beli (PPJB) hak atas tanah. Syiah Kuala Law Journal, 4(2), 123–140. https://doi.org/10.24815/sklj.v4i2.17021

Akbar, M. A. P. (2022). Wanprestasi dalam akta pengikatan jual beli tanah dan bangunan yang masuk dalam boedel pailit. Jurnal Indonesian Notary, 4(1).

Apeldoorn, L. V. (1958). Pengantar ilmu hukum (O. Sadino, Trans.). Pradnya Paramita.

Asshiddiqie, J. (2006). Pengantar ilmu hukum tata negara.

Bernard, L., Simanjuntak, Y. N., Hage, M. Y., & Tanya, B. L. (2010). Teori hukum: Strategi tertib manusia lintas ruang dan generasi. Genta Publishing.

Campbell, H. (2018). Black’s law dictionary. Thomson Reuters.

Harahap, Y. (2018). Hukum acara perdata: Tentang gugatan, persidangan, penyitaan, pembuktian, dan putusan pengadilan. Sinar Grafika.

Hartono, J. (2021). Tanggung gugat pra kontrak transaksi jual beli berdasar negosiasi dengan itikad buruk. Notaire, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.20473/ntr.v4i1.24845

Kelsen, H. (2019). Teori hukum murni: Dasar-dasar ilmu hukum normatif (R. Muttaqin, Trans.).

Mertokusumo, S. (1996). Penemuan hukum: Sebuah pengantar. Liberty.

Muskibah, M., & Hidayah, L. N. (2020). Penerapan prinsip kebebasan berkontrak dalam kontrak standar pengadaan barang dan jasa pemerintah di Indonesia. Refleksi Hukum: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 4(2), 175–194. https://doi.org/10.24246/jrh.2020.v4.i2.p175-194

Paramaningrat Manuaba, I. B., Parsa, I. W., & Ariawan, I. G. K. (2018). Prinsip kehati-hatian notaris dalam membuat akta autentik. Acta Comitas, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.24843/ac.2018.v03.i01.p05

Priyono, E. (2017). Peranan asas itikad baik dalam kontrak baku (upaya menjaga keseimbangan bagi para pihak). Diponegoro Private Law Review, 1(1).

Rahardjo, S. (2006). Hukum dalam jagat ketertiban. UKI Press.

Sabrina, R. R., & Musyafah, A. A. (2024). Pertanggungjawaban notaris dalam kesalahan pembuatan akta. Notarius, 17.

Satrio, J. (1995). Hukum perikatan: Perikatan yang lahir dari perjanjian (Buku II). Citra Aditya Bakti.

Sihotang, A. P., Sari, G. N., Arifin, Z., & Wahyudin, M. I. (2023). Pembatalan perjanjian jual beli tanah oleh penjual karena pembeli wanprestasi. Jurnal USM Law Review, 6(3). https://doi.org/10.26623/julr.v6i3.7502

Sitanggang, C. E. P., Putri, J. K., Setyabudi, A. H., & Alfiana, S. (2024). Restitutio in integrum in criminal regulation of restitution for victims of criminal acts. Journal of Law, Politics, and Humanities, 5(1).

Soemadiningrat, R. O. S. (2009). Filsafat hukum: perkembangan & dinamika masalah.

Subekti, R. (2005). Hukum perjanjian. PT Intermasa.

Zakia, I. (2020). Wanprestasi dalam perjanjian pengikatan jual beli secara angsuran dan tanggung jawab notaris berdasarkan analisis putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 884 PK/Pdt/2018. Indonesian Notary, 2(2), 20

Downloads

Published

2026-04-21